Four-winged Microraptor Had Iridescent Black Plumage, Suggests Feathers Developed for Display
![]() An artist's recreation of Microraptor, a pigeon-sized, four-winged dinosaur that lived about 130 million years ago. Recent research has shown that the dinosaur had iridescent plumage. (Jason Brougham/University of Texas) |
From keeping birds warm to assisting them in flight, feathers have a wide variety of functions. But the evolution of this miracle trait—one of birds’ most unique and beautiful characteristics—has long-eluded ornithologists and paleontologists alike. But a new study of the four-winged dinosaur Microraptor suggests the trait could have also developed to attract mates.
A team of 10 American and Chinese researchers revealed the color and feather pattern of Microraptor, a pigeon-sized, four-winged dinosaur that lived about 130 million years ago. The study, to be published in the March 9 edition of Science, not only determines the dinosaur had iridescent black feathers, but also emphasizes the importance of display in feather evolution.
![]() Reconstruction of a Microraptor based on digital overlays of nine fossilized specimens. (American Museum of Natural History/M. Ellison) |
This is the first published record of a non-avian creature with iridescent feathers says Mark Norell, one of the study’s authors and chair of the American Museum of Natural History's Division of Paleontology. Like a crow or starling’s iridescent feathers, the Mircroraptor’s feathers would have appeared to change color with the angle of illumination. “It’s the diffraction of light,” says Norell.
These bright black feathers, along with the Mircroraptor’s long tail, would have hindered its ability to move around and elude predators, explains Matt Shawkey, a co-author and associate professor of biology at the University of Akron.
“The idea is that when you see bright colors on birds and when you see things like ornaments, like a peacocks’ tail, things that are really showy but hindered ability, it was probably something to display to a potential mate,” says Shawkey.
“We argued that the primary role of the feather was for communication—recognizing individuals of the same species, luring different sex,” explains Ke-Qin Gao, another coauthor of the study and researcher from Peking University in Beijing.
While the Microraptor has four wings and other bird-like traits, it is considered a non-avian dinosaur, included in the same group as the Velociraptor. Scientists can only speculate about the purpose for the Microraptor’s four wings, but Norell says that they could have been used for gliding.
![]() Fossilized Microraptor specimen from the Beijing Museum of Natural History. (American Museum of Natural History/M. Ellison) |
“When we look at the shape of the wings they really do resemble flying animals, but I don’t think that any of us think that this dinosaur actually flew,” Norell says. “It may have used the wings for gliding.”
However, Julia Clarke, another co-authors and an associate professor of paleontology at The University of Texas at Austin, says she believes the Microraptor probably wouldn’t have just used the wings for gliding, but may have used them for short spurts of flight.
“I personally believe it was more active than gliding, that there’s some precursor to the avian flight stroke that is there,” she says.
The study also determines the Microraptor’s tail was broader than previously believed, and was probably also related to communication like the creature’s feathers.
In the study, researchers sampled the feathers from Microraptor fossil from northeastern China in Beijing Museum of Natural History. They then compared the samples’ melanosomes—pigment-bearing organelles that partially produce feather color—with those of modern birds.
When melanosomes are organized in stacked layers, feathers are iridescent. Using a database of melanosomes from a variety of contemporary birds, a statistical analysis predicted the Microraptor was black with a glossy, iridescent blue sheen.
The new findings contradict other studies suggesting that the Microraptor was nocturnal, as dark, iridescent plumage is not common in modern nighttime birds.
Related:
- -“Trove of Dinosaur and Bird Feathers Preserved in Amber Offers Novel Evolutionary Insights”
- -“Rufous Dinosaur? Study Identifies Dino Feather Colors”
- -“Another Study Sheds Light on Dinosaurs' Feathers”





Comments
As I understand it,
As I understand it, dinosaurs didn’t actually have scales, since they weren’t like modern reptiles (I have a vague impression that they share a closer ancestor with mammals, but I could be fuzzy on the evolutionary tree.). They had a smooth skin, of which impression fossils have been found. Of course, I would still love to know what color T. Rex was! And a method for determining scale color could still be used on ancient crocodile fossils, for instance.
How did species survive if
How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems, etc. were still evolving? sun odyssey 54 ds
There are natural limits to
There are natural limits to evolution. The genes already exist in all natural species for micro-evolution (variations within biological "kinds" such as for varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but the genes do not exist in natural species for macro-evolution (variations across biological "kinds" such as from worm to human) property mallorca
I read about it and it is a
I read about it and it is a beautiful and interesting bird in my opinion.
What a nice species.
What a nice species. Excellent!
Surely you meant to say
Surely you meant to say "eluded" and not "alluded"
That said, this was a fascinating article despite the obiter dicta of Mr Raganathan.
THIS WASN'T A DINOSAUR! It
THIS WASN'T A DINOSAUR! It was a bird (that's why it had fully-formed feathers!), but evolutionists classified it as a dinosaur to fit their theory. All of its traits were fully-formed and developed (not in a transitional state, i.e. part scales/part feathers). Species in a true transitional state wouldn't be fit for survival! Read the excellent Internet article, "Is New Fossil A Bird-Eating Dinosaur?" by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas.
There are natural limits to evolution. The genes already exist in all natural species for micro-evolution (variations within biological "kinds" such as for varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but the genes do not exist in natural species for macro-evolution (variations across biological "kinds" such as from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems, etc. were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
I was actually considering
I was actually considering reading that article until you mentioned Brian Thomas been a creationist, if I wanted to "learn" from a creationist I would just read from the Bible...
You wrote: "Species in a
You wrote: "Species in a true transitional state wouldn't be fit for survival!" Sorry, wrong! It's fit for survival in the environment in which it was in at that time and for a purpose different from the one it eventually served as it changed. The features that begin to differentiate one species from another don't have some conscious intent to become something in particular. The skin cells that began to form structures that would eventually become flight feathers served some other purpose entirely before they became feathers.
it is nice to read about it.
it is nice to read about it. This is an excellent article. You have great writing skills.
Does Four-winged Microraptor
Does Four-winged Microraptor is a kind of bird, the pictures are so beautiful.