Extra Legs and Stunted Penises Make the NYT--At Last!

Categories:

The Newspaper of Record broke new ground last Sunday. No, I’m not referring to the nearly life-sized picture of Michael Jackson emblazoned above the fold; that was Friday. I mean Sunday’s astonishingly frank and accurate essay about endocrine disruptors—synthetic chemicals that behave like artificial hormones, now widespread in the environment and causing serious impacts on the health of wildlife and humans.

Naturally the piece didn’t appear in Tuesday’s Science Times. The last thing I read about endocrine disruptors there was a squib reiterating the chemical industry’s mantra that Dose Makes the Poison and assuring readers that the amounts of endocrine-disrupting bisphenol-A leaching from plastic water bottles is nothing to worry about. Yes, that would be the very same bisphenol-A now banned from use in baby products in Canada and the European Union.

No, the New York Times’ piece about endocrine disruptors appeared on the Op-Ed page. Nicholas Kristof wrote it, and he didn’t hold back.

Kristof listed a stunning array of the known effects of these chemicals, including an epidemic of stunted male genitals, undescended testicles, deformed penises, lowered sperm counts, endometriosis, obesity, cancer, and abnormal brain development, in wildlife species as well as in humans, in many, many parts of the world.
  
You can’t fit a lot of information into a standard sized newspaper column, so Kristof left out a few things you might want to know. For instance, he didn’t have room for the key fact that minute – truly infinitesimal—amounts of these chemicals have been shown to cause permanent adverse effects, particularly in developing fetuses and children. One expert compared it to as little as one drop of gin in 660 train tank cars of tonic. Our bodies respond to our own hormones at those trace levels, after all.

What else didn’t Kristof have room to say? Well, other than saying that these synthetic industrial chemicals are widely used in agriculture, industry, and consumer products, he didn’t elaborate on what consumer products actually contain these scary chemicals.

Virtually all of them, it turns out, including the laptop I’m typing this on and the vinyl hose I’m going to use to refill my birdbath when I’m done. He also didn’t explain how hormone-scrambling chemicals are leaping from my laptop and garden hose into the bodies of developing fetuses and you and me and frogs and alligators.
   
Nor did he give us anything to go on. What can we do? How can we protect the environment and ourselves?
   
Well, we need the government to step in here, of course, but while we’re waiting—and phoning our representatives—there’s quite a lot we can do. I’ll post more on this tomorrow. Time to close the laptop and fill the birdbath. And—here’s a hint—wash my hands vigorously with soap and water when I’m done.

Blog Promo: 

Comments

Thank you for this nice

Thank you for this nice post

my blog: alpha male | how to run faster

The work I have already been

The work I have already been asked to do, inventorying compounds used at facilities that are listed as endocrin disruptors, indicates that it is going to be very difficult to address this problem because the compounds are ubiquitous. virtuemart templates

Thanks for this

Thanks for this

Anything new?

Just checking back in here and don't see anything new. Is the problem solved? Have the chemical companies all gone natural? Would like some more news if there is anything.

Yikes!

Thanks for elaborating on this issue - scary but important. I'm looking forward to the next post with all the answers.

Have you...

"...stunted male genitals, undescended testicles, deformed penises, lowered sperm counts, endometriosis, obesity, cancer, and abnormal brain development..."

Did I leave my medical records on your kitchen table or something? And here I was thinking it was just about getting old.

Nice post, Ms. McGrath. I look forward to more along these lines.

- Austin

Very thought-provoking.

Very thought-provoking.

Now I am wondering about the plastic plumbing that runs throughout my house. Do I have to worry about detoxing after I wash my hands, after I water the flowers with the vinyl hose?

Endocrine disruptors

So glad to see Audubon bringing this important topic to the forefront. When I read Our Stolen Future I expected big changes, soon--but nothing happened. The problem just silently grew bigger. Let's hope that Susan McGrath's humorous but deeply informed writing will coax some Americans to pull their heads out of the sand and demand some answers from our elected representatives.

New York Times

Can you give us the link to the Kristof piece? And, what about the Science Times? I read that almost every week, have they done anything on this yet, seems right up their alley.

Whoops! Here's the URL:

Whoops! Here's the URL:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/opinion/28kristof.html?_r=1

As far as I know the Science Times hasn't run a feature on endocrine disruptors in modern memory. The section did run a now infamous review of Theo Colborn's book, Our Stolen Future. The book was published in 1996. It's still very current and readable. I recommend it highly -- despite its savaging by the Times!

Kristof's Blog has incredible traffic -- check it out.

I checked out Kristof's blog and there is some great stuff in there, the link is below. I just read about two dozen posts, very thoughtful and a great resource for anyone interested in this subject.

http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/your-comments-on-endocrine-d...

Our Stolen Future

What a great title for the Kristof piece, "It’s Time to Learn From Frogs" but I thought that we were losing our frogs, is endocrine disruption the reason for frog loss?

Also, when did the Times review "Our Stolen Future?"

It is a great book, here is a link to Amazon.com to buy it, but more importantly go to this link and read the reviews, very impressive. How could the Times pan something like this?

http://www.amazon.com/Our-Stolen-Future-Threatening-Intelligence/dp/0452...

Frogs and Our Stolen Future

Everything from acid rain to the endocrine disrupting pesticide atrazine to a killer fungal infection called chytridiomycosis have been implicated in frog decline.

The citation for the New York Times review of Our Stolen Future is:

Gina Kolata, "Chemicals That Mimic Hormones Stir Alarm and Debate," New York Times, March 19, 1995, pg. C1

You may have trouble finding the review online, but you'll find plenty of critiques of the review itself.

Fascinating

I work in environmental remediation and endocrin disruptors are a potentially explosive topic that would radically change how we look at contaminants. EPA Maximum contaminant levels are often accused of being too low, but those levels are orders of magnitude higher than what appear to be causing effects in nature. If the findings prove out in the long term, it is going to be very difficult to regulate these compounds. Industry is very concerned about an all out ban. The work I have already been asked to do, inventorying compounds used at facilities that are listed as endocrin disruptors, indicates that it is going to be very difficult to address this problem because the compounds are ubiquitous.

Mitigation

What kinds of methods is your firm using on endocrine disrupting compounds at remediation sites under current clean-up standards?

why is this so difficult?

curious why this is so difficult, and what are they putting this stuff in anyway, is it essential stuff (food?) or non-essential stuff (floaties for kids?).

Endocrine disrupters

Thanks for keeping the focus on this undereported and terrifying issue.