Be Not Afraid

 We’ve known for years something is wrong out there. There’s no hiding from the catalogue of health effects—sky-rocketing rates of obesity, heart disease, diabetes, infertility, ADHD, creepy physical deformities in reptiles, amphibians, and fish, and I’ll stop right there.

But why this stuff is happening, what’s behind it all, has been smothered under a blanket of censorship and misinformation for decades—a blackout most news outlets have happily gone along with. When Colburn et al. published the extraordinarily well written and carefully researched book that first laid out the case against low-dose endocrine disruptors, Our Stolen Future, in 1996, the newspaper of note (yes, that’s code for the New York Times) responded with a now-infamous review trashing their evidence and invoking “environmentalists” Al Gore and Robert Redford in the first sentence. The review was so blatantly close-minded that it has subsequently rated whole articles about it.

 Now, at last, the truth about the poisonous drizzle of synthetic chemicals is breaking out into the open. And while we’ve all been dozing under the blanket, scientists have been uncovering the mechanisms by which these chemicals harm organisms; and they can now back up their theories with reams of gold-standard studies.

Most exciting to this writer is that some of the foremost scientists in this field have gotten fed up with PR hacks with B.A.s in communications trumping their painstaking scientific evidence. They’ve stopped mumbling, “oh, well, whatever,” and wandering back to the lab in their white coats. Instead they’re duking it out with the industry.

In the case of bisphenol-A, in particular, researchers are starting to speak loudly, plainly, and in language the public—and reporters—understand. Equally important is the fact that newspapers are finally covering the issue. No, not the New York Times, apart from on the op-ed page, but the Milwaukee Sentinel Journal, the Washington Post, and USA Today, among others.

As a result of all of this lie-down-on-the-railroad-tracks-inducing news, change is going to be sweeping down on us like a (okay, very slow) freight train. Actual regulatory change, believe it or not. Washington State just two weeks ago passed legislation that will make the state the first to ban BPA from baby bottles, sippy cups, and other products intended for use by children. (Ahem, take that, greener-than-thou California.)

So get up off the tracks! It’s not like we didn’t know all this in our guts anyway. The fact that we’re hearing about this is good news; it means industry is losing its control over the issue. As Peter Ross puts it in the Audubon story, you can’t get the good news without first knowing the bad.

Comments

Local action to complement national?

Susan -- Nice article ("Pandora's Water Bottle") -- well researched and well written. Reminds me of the old Household Environmentalist days 20+ years ago. Got ideas for how we can organize around this issue at the local Seattle level? Seems like change needs to happen nationally on chemical policy generally and on ingredients in consumer products specifically. But is there a bottom-up approach to change demand at the local level that can complement the debate around TSCA reform? I'll buy the lead-free coffee if you've got time to chat. -- an old colleague from the Northwet

The local level

Hi Dave,

Nice to hear from you!

I should be asking you about the local level -- you've been active in moving things forward here in Seattle for a long time.

 What I'm finding is that even here in screamingly green Seattle people know next to nothing about endocrine disruptors, other than that they need to replace their beloved Nalgenes. So in the short term the answer is education, education, education. 

Got any good ideas? Coffee sounds like a good one!

Be not afraid? - you've got to be kidding

No Birdman - the question is what has been keeping publications such as this one from getting the word out to their readers.

Studies have been out there for over 15 years now - this is not anything new. Even further if you want to get technical - Remember Rachel Carson and Silent Spring? We are living it

Below are two "recent" links, the oldest 5 years -

http://www.baylor.edu/pr/bitn/news.php?action=story&story=37417

http://sites.google.com/site/friendsofbigbearvalley/home

"Be Not Afraid"? Odd title for an article that should invoke rage from those who read it - probably won't though - too much Prozac in the drinking water.

Action?

That was a kind of a mixed post, somehow it makes one feel good but it seems like there is so far to go. Is there a group that is working on the national political level? Or are there any members of Congress that have made this their issue? Where do we go to find out about that? Is Obama tuned into this at all?